ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Center2021
Guidelines for clinical practice of
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-Concentration Enhancement Effect: Enabling Sensitive Detection of EML4-ALK Variants via Multiplex RT-MIRA.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- A New Approach of DetectingCancers · 2024Article
- A nomogram for predicting invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules based on follow-up CT imaging.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Real-world data on ALK rearrangement test in Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer (RATICAL): a nationwide multicenter retrospective study.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2024Article
- Identification of a novel RMST-ALK rearrangement in advanced lung adenocarcinoma and durable response to ceritinib: A case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement defines a molecular subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ALK inhibitors (ALKIs) confer significant clinical benefits in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC; therefore, it is of great clinical significance to select accurate, rapid, and appropriate ALK testing methods to screen for patients who are suitable for anti-ALK treatment. In recent years, great progress has been made in the development and clinical application of ALKIs, as well as in our understanding of acquired drug resistance mechanisms. Meanwhile, new ALK companion diagnostic platforms have been developed and applied in clinical practice. Although many studies have shown that there is a high rate of concordance among these platforms, new problems continue to appear during testing. To maximize the benefit for patients, accurate testing results can be obtained by first selecting the appropriate testing method and then formulating, optimizing, and complying with the standardized testing process in accordance with the testing population and specimen types. With the ongoing accumulation of clinical practice data, experience from quality control of ALK testing, and results from multicenter research, an updated expert consensus is necessary. The experts who participated in the discussion and development of this guideline have a rich background in theoretical and clinical testing experience, which ensures the practical value of the information presented in this guideline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.