Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036792›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2023

Towards Automatic Cartilage Quantification in Clinical Trials - Continuing from the 2019 IWOAI Knee Segmentation Challenge.

Erik B Dam, Arjun D Desai, Cem M Deniz, Haresh R Rajamohan, Ravinder Regatte, Claudia Iriondo, Valentina Pedoia, Sharmila Majumdar, Mathias Perslev, Christian Igel and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Erik B DamUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Arjun D DesaiStanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Cem M DenizNew York University, Langone Health, New York, NY USA.
Haresh R RajamohanNew York University, New York, NY USA.
Ravinder RegatteNew York University, Langone Health, New York, NY USA.
Claudia IriondoUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Valentina PedoiaUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Sharmila MajumdarUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Mathias PerslevUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian IgelUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Akshay PaiCerebriu A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sibaji GajCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA.
Mingrui YangCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA.
Kunio NakamuraCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA.
Xiaojuan LiCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA.
Hasan MaqboolUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, FL USA.
Ismail IrmakciNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL USA.
Sang-Eun SongUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, FL USA.
Ulas BagciNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL USA.
Brian HargreavesStanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Garry GoldStanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Akshay ChaudhariStanford University, Stanford, CA USA.

Funding

Rapid MRI for Evaluation of OsteoarthritisR01EB002524 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Akshay Chaudhari, Garry E Gold · 2003 to 2026
$10.1M
TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Imaging post-traumatic osteoarthritis 10-years after ACL reconstruction: a multicenter cohort study with quantitative MRIR01AR075422 · NIAMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LI, XIAOJUAN, SPINDLER, KURT PAUL · 2019 to 2023
$4.6M
Multi-Vendor Multi-Site Novel Accelerated MRI RelaxometryR01AR077452 · NIAMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LI, XIAOJUAN · 2020 to 2025
$3.6M
Rapid Low-Cost Quantitative 3D MRI and Gait Assessment of the KneeR01AR077604 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HARGREAVES, BRIAN ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Imaging of Joint Response to Physiological Stress with Age, Sex and in OsteoarthritisR01AR079431 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Feliks Kogan · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Deep Learning-based Imaging Biomarkers for Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR074453 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DENIZ, CEM MURAT · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Development of Sodium Fluoride PET-MRI for Quantitative Assessment of Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR074492 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, GARRY E · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Automated Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Patient Outcome Prediction using Deep LearningK25AR078928 · NIAMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Mingrui Yang · 2022 to 2026
$678k
NIAMS NIH HHS K25 AR078928NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074453NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074492NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075422NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077452NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077604NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079431NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the deep learning (DL) segmentation methods from the six teams that participated in the IWOAI 2019 Knee Cartilage Segmentation Challenge are appropriate for quantifying cartilage loss in longitudinal clinical trials. Design: We included 556 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative study with manually read cartilage volume scores for the baseline and 1-year visits. The teams used their methods originally trained for the IWOAI 2019 challenge to segment the 1130 knee MRIs. These scans were anonymized and the teams were blinded to any subject or visit identifiers. Two teams also submitted updated methods. The resulting 9,040 segmentations are available online.The segmentations included tibial, femoral, and patellar compartments. In post-processing, we extracted medial and lateral tibial compartments and geometrically defined central medial and lateral femoral sub-compartments. The primary study outcome was the sensitivity to measure cartilage loss as defined by the standardized response mean (SRM). Results: For the tibial compartments, several of the DL segmentation methods had SRMs similar to the gold standard manual method. The highest DL SRM was for the lateral tibial compartment at 0.38 (the gold standard had 0.34). For the femoral compartments, the gold standard had higher SRMs than the automatic methods at 0.31/0.30 for medial/lateral compartments. Conclusion: The lower SRMs for the DL methods in the femoral compartments at 0.2 were possibly due to the simple sub-compartment extraction done during post-processing. The study demonstrated that state-of-the-art DL segmentation methods may be used in standardized longitudinal single-scanner clinical trials for well-defined cartilage compartments.

Indexed as

cartilageclinical trialdeep learningkneeMRI

Identifiers

PMID39036792
PMCPMC11258861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.