ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2023
Towards Automatic Cartilage Quantification in Clinical Trials - Continuing from the 2019 IWOAI Knee Segmentation Challenge.
Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic framework for evaluating osteoarthritic cartilage severity: high-resolution cartilage thickness mapping and scoring.European radiology · 2026Article
- 20 Years of the International Workshop on Osteoarthritis imaging (IWOAI): From a Small Pre-Alpine Village to a Global Community.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2026Review
- Clinical validation of fully automated (peri-)articular tissue analysis for assessing osteoarthritis progression: A narrative review.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Review
- A fully-automated technique for cartilage morphometry in knees with severe radiographic osteoarthritis - Method development and validation.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
- Comparison between coronal FLASH and sagittal double echo steady state MRI in detecting longitudinal cartilage thickness change by fully automated segmentation - Data from the FNIH biomarker cohort.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
- Updates on Compositional MRI Mapping of the Cartilage: Emerging Techniques and Applications.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether the deep learning (DL) segmentation methods from the six teams that participated in the IWOAI 2019 Knee Cartilage Segmentation Challenge are appropriate for quantifying cartilage loss in longitudinal clinical trials. Design: We included 556 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative study with manually read cartilage volume scores for the baseline and 1-year visits. The teams used their methods originally trained for the IWOAI 2019 challenge to segment the 1130 knee MRIs. These scans were anonymized and the teams were blinded to any subject or visit identifiers. Two teams also submitted updated methods. The resulting 9,040 segmentations are available online.The segmentations included tibial, femoral, and patellar compartments. In post-processing, we extracted medial and lateral tibial compartments and geometrically defined central medial and lateral femoral sub-compartments. The primary study outcome was the sensitivity to measure cartilage loss as defined by the standardized response mean (SRM). Results: For the tibial compartments, several of the DL segmentation methods had SRMs similar to the gold standard manual method. The highest DL SRM was for the lateral tibial compartment at 0.38 (the gold standard had 0.34). For the femoral compartments, the gold standard had higher SRMs than the automatic methods at 0.31/0.30 for medial/lateral compartments. Conclusion: The lower SRMs for the DL methods in the femoral compartments at 0.2 were possibly due to the simple sub-compartment extraction done during post-processing. The study demonstrated that state-of-the-art DL segmentation methods may be used in standardized longitudinal single-scanner clinical trials for well-defined cartilage compartments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.