Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036784›Full record

ReviewSpace science reviews2024

Geologic Constraints on the Formation and Evolution of Saturn's Mid-Sized Moons.

Alyssa Rose Rhoden, Sierra N Ferguson, William Bottke, Julie C Castillo-Rogez, Emily Martin, Michael Bland, Michelle Kirchoff, Marco Zannoni, Nicolas Rambaux, Julien Salmon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Space science reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alyssa Rose RhodenSouthwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St, Boulder, CO 80302 USA.
Sierra N FergusonSouthwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St, Boulder, CO 80302 USA.
William BottkeSouthwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St, Boulder, CO 80302 USA.
Julie C Castillo-RogezJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA.
Emily MartinCenter for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC USA.
Michael BlandU.S. Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ USA.
Michelle KirchoffSouthwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St, Boulder, CO 80302 USA.
Marco ZannoniDipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Forlì, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-9656
Nicolas RambauxIMCCE, CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Université, Sorbonne Université, Université de Lille 1, UMR 8028 du CNRS, 77 Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France.
Julien SalmonSouthwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St, Boulder, CO 80302 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saturn's mid-sized icy moons have complex relationships with Saturn's interior, the rings, and with each other, which can be expressed in their shapes, interiors, and geology. Observations of their physical states can, thus, provide important constraints on the ages and formation mechanism(s) of the moons, which in turn informs our understanding of the formation and evolution of Saturn and its rings. Here, we describe the cratering records of the mid-sized moons and the value and limitations of their use for constraining the histories of the moons. We also discuss observational constraints on the interior structures of the moons and geologically-derived inferences on their thermal budgets through time. Overall, the geologic records of the moons (with the exception of Mimas) include evidence of epochs of high heat flows, short- and long-lived subsurface oceans, extensional tectonics, and considerable cratering. Curiously, Mimas presents no clear evidence of an ocean within its surface geology, but its rotation and orbit indicate a present-day ocean. While the moons need not be primordial to produce the observed levels of interior evolution and geologic activity, there is likely a minimum age associated with their development that has yet to be determined. Uncertainties in the populations impacting the moons makes it challenging to further constrain their formation timeframes using craters, whereas the characteristics of their cores and other geologic inferences of their thermal evolutions may help narrow down their potential histories. Disruptive collisions may have also played an important role in the formation and evolution of Saturn's mid-sized moons, and even the rings of Saturn, although more sophisticated modeling is needed to determine the collision conditions that produce rings and moons that fit the observational constraints. Overall, the existence and physical characteristics of Saturn's mid-sized moons provide critical benchmarks for the development of formation theories.

Indexed as

CrateringDioneEnceladusGeologyIcy moonsInteriorsMimasOcean worldsRheaSaturnian satellitesTectonicsTethys

Identifiers

PMID39036784
PMCPMC11255024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.