Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036743›Full record

ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2024

The nature and magnitude of cognitive impairment in narcolepsy type 1, narcolepsy type 2, and idiopathic hypersomnia: a meta-analysis.

Brian T Harel, James J Gattuso, Robert D Latzman, Paul Maruff, Thomas E Scammell, Giuseppe Plazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association between sleep inertia and cognitive performance among older adults in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Idiopathic hypersomnia is a 24-hour disorder.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian T HarelNeuroscience Therapeutic Area Unit, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2576-0789
James J GattusoFlorey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0543-8728
Robert D LatzmanNeuroscience Therapeutic Area Unit, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-8090
Paul MaruffCogstate Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-9537
Thomas E ScammellDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7231-8558
Giuseppe PlazziIRCCS-Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1051-0472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) often report cognitive impairment which can be quite burdensome but is rarely evaluated in routine clinical practice. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the nature and magnitude of cognitive impairment in NT1, NT2, and IH in studies conducted from January 2000 to October 2022. We classified cognitive tests assessing memory, executive function, and attention by cognitive domain. Between-group differences were analyzed as standardized mean differences (Cohen's

Indexed as

cognitive impairmentidiopathic hypersomniameta-analysisnarcolepsysustained attention

Identifiers

PMID39036743
PMCPMC11258808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.