ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery. A single-center, retrospective cohort study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Diagnostic Indicators in Patients With Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia After Cardiac Surgery].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Article
- "Keep HIT in Mind and Take Care". Multiple Tips From a Single Patient.International medical case reports journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac surgery is a high-risk setting for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, large differences in its incidence, rate of thrombotic complications, and mortality have been reported in this context. Few studies address the pharmacologic management of HIT specifically in this setting. Objectives: To describe the incidence, outcomes, and management of patients with HIT in our cohort and to compare them with patients presenting platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies but without platelet-activating capacity. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted over a period of 10 years and 6 months on 13,178 cardiac operations in a single high-volume cardiac surgery center. Results: HIT was diagnosed in 0.22% of patients. HIT with associated thromboembolic complications occurred in 0.04% of cases. Two deaths at 30 days were registered, both in patients with associated thrombosis. The 4T score showed a 99.9% negative predictive value. The immunoglobulin G-specific chemiluminescence test positivity rate was highly predictive of HIT. Warfarin was often started early after surgery, and although it was rarely stopped when the diagnosis of HIT was made, no new thromboembolic complications subsequently occurred. Thrombocytopenia appeared to be a poor prognostic sign, whatever the cause. Conclusion: Although rare, HIT is characterized by high mortality in this setting, especially if thrombotic complications occur. Large multicentric studies or an international registry should be created to enhance the scientific evidence on HIT diagnosis and management in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.