ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2024
Physicians' Perspective on Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease in Pakistan.
Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study, conducted in Pakistan, examines the perspectives of 1200 physicians across diverse specialties regarding Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Using a random sampling approach, physicians participated in a survey that assessed their familiarity with LAAO, views on its effectiveness and safety, experience levels, and encountered challenges. The results unveil a spectrum of knowledge levels among physicians, reinforcing the need for tailored medical education and training programs. The majority of respondents were between 30 and 49 years old (59.8 %). A notable proportion, 33.3 %, had limited or no knowledge of LAAO, with 16.7 % having never heard of the procedure, and 16.7 % having limited knowledge but no experience. About 36.2 % of physicians believed LAAO was moderately to extremely effective in reducing stroke risk, with 23.3 % considering it very effective and 25.4 % believing it to be extremely effective. The most commonly cited clinical indications were a history of recurrent strokes despite anticoagulation (34.6 %) and a high CHA2DS2-VASc score (27.3 %). Renal considerations played a significant role, with 33.1 % considering LAAO for CKD stage 4 or 5 patients with elevated stroke risk. Patient preferences, such as a desire to avoid long-term anticoagulant use, were important for 28.7 % of physicians. Identified challenges encompass limited equipment access, training gaps, patient reluctance, and administrative complexities. Furthermore, the study underscores the pivotal role of shared decision-making in healthcare delivery. These findings lay essential groundwork for improving LAAO utilization and patient-centered care in Pakistan's healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.