Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036563›Full record

ReviewJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2024

Efficacy and Safety of Pressure-controlled Intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion in STEMI: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sarim Rashid, Hesham Naeem, Muhammad A Aneeq, Parversh K Rathi, Bakht Umer, Laveeza Fatima, Jawad Basit, Amin Mehmoodi, Jahanzeb Malik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarim RashidDepartment of General Surgery, Eash Lancashire NHS Hospital, Burnley, UK.
Hesham NaeemDepartment of Cardiology, Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad A AneeqDepartment of Cardiology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Parversh K RathiDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Bakht UmerDepartment of Cardiology, Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Laveeza FatimaDepartment of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Jawad BasitDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Canterbury, UK.
Amin MehmoodiDepartment of Medicine, Ibn e Seena Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Jahanzeb MalikDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Canterbury, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review will provide a comprehensive assessment of the evidence on PICSO in STEMI patients, and it will help to determine the role of this novel technique in the management of STEMI. The review searched for the relevant articles in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases regarding PC-ICSO. Four cohort studies were eligible to be included in the quantitative analysis. In the pooled analysis, the use of PICSO was associated with a significant reduction in infarct size (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI = -0.76,-0.13, p = 0.004). PICSO administration was associated with a reduced risk of developing microvascular resistance (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62,0.92, p = 0.0051). The post-procedural Index of Microvascular Occlusion (MVO) was lower in the PICSO treated compared to the control group and this result was homogenous and statistically significant (SMD = -0.35, 95% CI = -0.68-0.01, p = 0.03, I

Indexed as

IschemiaIschemic heart diseaseMicrovascular obstruction

Identifiers

PMID39036563
PMCPMC11259468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.