ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Center2022
Risk assessment of self-sampling HPV tests based on PCR, signal amplification to guide the appropriate screening intervals: A prospective study in China.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HPV genotype distribution and cervical lesions in colposcopy-referred women in Western China: a cross-sectional study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Progress toward cervical cancer elimination: global disparities and China's contributions.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We assessed the longitudinal risk of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CINs) with self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) tests, based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and signal amplification ( Methods: A prospective study was conducted in China during 2017-2020. Participants were invited for PCR and Results: A total of 8,126 women were included in the final analysis. Women positive for the PCR HPV test had comparable IRs of CIN2+ and CIN3+ to those positive on the Conclusions: Routine screening with 3-year intervals is acceptable for self-sampling HPV tests based on PCR or
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.