Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036512›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

A comprehensive phylogeny and revised taxonomy of Diadectomorpha with a discussion on the origin of tetrapod herbivory.

Jasper Ponstein, Mark J MacDougall, Jörg Fröbisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jasper PonsteinHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-2565
Mark J MacDougallMuseum für Naturkunde Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-312X
Jörg FröbischHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among terrestrial tetrapods, the origin of herbivory marked a key evolutionary event that allowed for the evolution of modern terrestrial ecosystems. A 100 Ma gap separates the oldest terrestrial tetrapods and the first undisputed herbivorous tetrapods. While four clades of early tetrapod herbivores are undisputed amniotes, the phylogenetic position of Diadectomorpha with respect to Amniota has long been controversial. Given that the origin of herbivory coincides with the oldest amniotes, and obligate herbivory is unknown within amphibians, this suggests that a key adaptation necessary to evolve obligate herbivory is unique to amniotes. Historically, phylogenetic analyses have found Diadectomorpha as the sister-group to amniotes, but recent analyses recover Diadectomorpha as sister-group to Synapsida, within Amniota. We tested whether diadectomorphs are amniotes by updating the most recent character-taxon matrix. Specifically, we added new characters from the lower jaw and added diadectomorph taxa, resulting in a dataset of 341 characters and 61 operational taxonomic units. We updated the description of five diadectomorph jaws using microcomputed tomography data. Our majority-rule consensus places Diadectomorpha as sister-group to Synapsida; other methods do not recover this relationship. We revise diadectomorph taxonomy, erecting a new species from the early Permian Bromacker locality, Germany, and a new genus to accommodate '

Indexed as

Diadectomorphaherbivorymandibular anatomyPalaeozoicphylogenytetrapoda

Identifiers

PMID39036512
PMCPMC11257076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.