Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

The planet on our plates: approaches to incorporate environmental sustainability within food-based dietary guidelines.

Corné van Dooren, Brent Loken, Tim Lang, Helle Margrete Meltzer, Sarah Halevy, Loes Neven, Kristof Rubens, Marije Seves-Santman, Ellen Trolle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sustainable diets: where from and where to?Journal of nutritional science · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Corné van DoorenWWF-NL, Zeist, Netherlands.
Brent LokenWWF Global Science, Washington, DC, United States.
Tim LangCentre for Food Policy, City University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Helle Margrete MeltzerNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Sarah HalevyWWF-UK, Woking, United Kingdom.
Loes NevenFlanders Institute for Healthy Living (Gezond Leven vzw), Brussels, Belgium.
Kristof RubensDepartment of Environment and Spatial Development (Flemish Government), Brussels, Belgium.
Marije Seves-SantmanThe Netherlands Nutrition Centre(Voedingscentrum), The Hague, Netherlands.
Ellen TrolleNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many decades, food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) were only health-oriented. This changed post-2009 when gradually, an increasing number of countries began to include environmental sustainability considerations in their guidelines. International organisations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have stated that governments should include environmental sustainability in future FBDGs. However, methodologies on how this should be done are lacking. Therefore, through workshops and discussions with experts, we analysed a selection of methodologies and classified them into six groups: (1) health first; (2) additional advice; (3) demonstrating synergies; (4) modelling impact; (5) combining strategies; (6) systems first. We then assessed how innovative each approach was and their potential for transformative impact. Of the 6 approaches investigated, only approaches 5 and 6 could be considered as disruptive innovations and leading to major changes. Adding environmental sustainability into FBDGs is a policy innovation and has become a debate between old and new multi-criteria guidelines for eating. With the addition of environmental sustainability in FBDGS, a new or emerging set of multi-criteria guidelines for judging food are being proposed that challenges past norms and governance. Today, there is growing scientific consensus that diets that are good for human health are also good for the environment. There is also a growing recognition that food system change is inevitable and desirable. We see this as a positive opportunity to collaborate on FBDGs that are more appropriate for the 21st century and ambitious enough to meet the environmental challenges at hand.

Indexed as

environmental sustainabilityfood-based dietary guidelinesfood systemsfood system transformationsustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID39036493
PMCPMC11259098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.