Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036485›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Exploring the influence and mechanism of different frying methods on the flavor quality of low-salt sour meat.

Lujie Cheng, Qia Wang, Xiefei Li, Xinyuan Huang, Fengping An, Zhang Luo, Jingjing Wang, Qiaohui Zeng, Peng Shang, Zhendong Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lujie ChengSchool of Public Health, Guizhou Province Engineering Research Center of Health Food Innovative Manufacturing, the Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control of Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Qia WangSchool of Public Health, Guizhou Province Engineering Research Center of Health Food Innovative Manufacturing, the Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control of Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Xiefei LiSchool of Public Health, Guizhou Province Engineering Research Center of Health Food Innovative Manufacturing, the Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control of Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Xinyuan HuangSchool of Public Health, Guizhou Province Engineering Research Center of Health Food Innovative Manufacturing, the Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control of Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Fengping AnCollege of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China.
Zhang LuoCollege of Food Science, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi, Tibet, Autonomous Region, 860000, China.
Jingjing WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Qiaohui ZengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Peng ShangCollege of Food Science, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi, Tibet, Autonomous Region, 860000, China.
Zhendong LiuCollege of Food Science, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi, Tibet, Autonomous Region, 860000, China.
Qun HuangSchool of Public Health, Guizhou Province Engineering Research Center of Health Food Innovative Manufacturing, the Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control of Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To obtain nutritious, healthy, and flavor-enriched sour meat products, the effects of different frying methods (microwave, air-frying, and traditional frying) on the flavor quality of low-salt sour meat were evaluated using metabolomics and other flavor analysis techniques. The pH value of the sour meat rose dramatically, while the TBARS value dropped significantly after frying. E-nose and E-tongue results showed that air-frying could reduce acidity and improve umami. The comprehensive analysis of all samples revealed the identification of 107 volatile flavor compounds, including 10 unique aroma compounds that were specifically detected in the AF group. Additionally, the air frying process notably increased the free amino acid and nucleotide concentrations in sour meat by 53.58% and 159.29%, respectively, while causing a significant reduction in both fatty acid and lactic acid content by 22.84% and 49.29%, respectively. All three frying methods altered the flavor of the samples, but air frying performed better in terms of flavor and texture.

Indexed as

Flavor qualityFrying methodLow-salt sour meatMetabolomicTibetan pork

Identifiers

PMID39036485
PMCPMC11260038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.