Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036440›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology advances

Germline susceptibility from broad genomic profiling of pediatric brain cancers.

Elaine R Mardis, Samara L Potter, Kathleen M Schieffer, Elizabeth A Varga, Mariam T Mathew, Heather M Costello, Gregory Wheeler, Benjamin J Kelly, Katherine E Miller, Elizabeth A R Garfinkle and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genotype-phenotype correlations inOncology reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elaine R MardisThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5892-1553
Samara L PotterThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kathleen M SchiefferThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Elizabeth A VargaThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Mariam T MathewThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Heather M CostelloThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Gregory WheelerThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Benjamin J KellyThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Katherine E MillerThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Elizabeth A R GarfinkleThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Richard K WilsonThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Catherine E CottrellThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying germline predisposition in CNS malignancies is of increasing clinical importance, as it contributes to diagnosis and prognosis, and determines aspects of treatment. The inclusion of germline testing has historically been limited due to challenges surrounding access to genetic counseling, complexity in acquiring a germline comparator specimen, concerns about the impact of findings, or cost considerations. These limitations were further defined by the breadth and scope of clinical testing to precisely identify complex variants as well as concerns regarding the clinical interpretation of variants including those of uncertain significance. Methods: In the course of conducting an IRB-approved protocol that performed genomic, transcriptomic and methylation-based characterization of pediatric CNS malignancies, we cataloged germline predisposition to cancer based on paired exome capture sequencing, coupled with computational analyses to identify variants in known cancer predisposition genes and interpret them relative to established clinical guidelines. Results: In certain cases, these findings refined diagnosis or prognosis or provided important information for treatment planning. Conclusions: We outline our aggregate findings on cancer predisposition within this cohort which identified 16% of individuals (27 of 168) harboring a variant predicting cancer susceptibility and contextualize the impact of these results in terms of treatment-related aspects of precision oncology.

Indexed as

cancer predispositiongenetic susceptibilityhereditary cancer syndromemolecular profiling

Identifiers

PMID39036440
PMCPMC11259010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.