ArticleNeurotrauma reports2024
"Roberto Rodríguez" General Teaching Hospital of Moron, Ciego De Avila, Cuba, Neurosurgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Services Pediatric Neuromonitoring in Severe Head Trauma.
Article in Neurotrauma reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among all types of trauma in children, traumatic brain injury has the greatest potential for the development of devastating consequences, with nearly three million affected each year in the world. A controlled, nonrandomized experimental study was carried out in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury, whose objective was to evaluate the use of continuous multimodal neuromonitoring (MMN) of intracranial parameters as a guide in the treatment of children of different age-groups. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment received; clinical and imaging monitoring was performed in both. Group I included those whose treatment was guided by MMN of intracranial parameters such as intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and intracranial compliance, and group II included those who had only clinical and imaging monitoring. Eighty patients were studied, 41 in group I and 39 in group II. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the sociodemographic variables and the results; as a consequence, both forms of treatment were outlined, for patients with MMN and for those who only have clinical and imaging monitoring. It is concluded that both treatment schemes can be used depending on technological availability, although the scheme with MMN is optimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.