ArticleNeurotrauma reports2024
Vitamin D Supplementation in Functional Recovery of Subjects with Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Controlled Randomized Study.
Article in Neurotrauma reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low vitamin D (VD) has been associated with poor clinical course in several neurological diseases. Supplementation has been suggested to improve outcomes. Severe acquired brain injury (sABI) subjects have low VD levels and disabling conditions requiring rehabilitation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if VD supplementation produced a better clinical course and a better functional outcome in sABI during rehabilitation. A randomized single-blind study was performed. sABI subjects were randomized to the VD supplementation group (VDsG) (initial dose of 50.000 UI and 1.000 daily) and usual care control group (CG). Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and Level of Cognitive Functioning (LCF) were used in assessing disability. A total of 73 subjects (42 M and 31 F; mean age 53.2 ± 15.7) were randomized: 36 (21 M and 15 F; mean age 57.52 ± 14.88) to VDsG and 37 (20 M and 17 F; mean age 48.28 ± 17.47) to CG. Both groups significantly improved after rehabilitation, and no between-group difference was observed. The mean score values for DRS, GOS, and LCF in VDsG were 18.83 ± 4.27 and 9.42 ± 5.83; 2.89 ± 0.32 and 3.78 ± 0.80; and 4.81 ± 1.70 and 7.53 ± 1.28, at admission and discharge, respectively. Likewise, mean values for DRS, GOS, and LCF in CG were 18.57 ± 4.80 and 9.84 ± 6.34; 2.84 ± 0.37 and 3.81 ± 0.94; and 4.97 ± 2.01 and 7.41 ± 1.32, respectively. VD supplementation did not improve functional outcomes in sABI during rehabilitation treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.