Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036289›Full record

ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2024

Image Quality Assessment Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Skin Images.

Hyeon Ki Jeong, Christine Park, Simon W Jiang, Matilda Nicholas, Suephy Chen, Ricardo Henao, Meenal Kheterpal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyeon Ki JeongDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Christine ParkDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Simon W JiangDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Matilda NicholasDepartment of Dermatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Suephy ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ricardo HenaoDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Meenal KheterpalDepartment of Dermatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The image quality received for clinical evaluation is often suboptimal. The goal is to develop an image quality analysis tool to assess patient- and primary care physician-derived images using deep learning model. Dataset included patient- and primary care physician-derived images from August 21, 2018 to June 30, 2022 with 4 unique quality labels. VGG16 model was fine tuned with input data, and optimal threshold was determined by Youden's index. Ordinal labels were transformed to binary labels using a majority vote because model distinguishes between 2 categories (good vs bad). At a threshold of 0.587, area under the curve for the test set was 0.885 (95% confidence interval = 0.838-0.933); sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.829, 0.784, 0.906, and 0.645, respectively. Independent validation of 300 additional images (from patients and primary care physicians) demonstrated area under the curve of 0.864 (95% confidence interval = 0.818-0.909) and area under the curve of 0.902 (95% confidence interval = 0.85-0.95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the 300 images were 0.827, 0.800, 0.959, and 0.450, respectively. We demonstrate a practical approach improving the image quality for clinical workflow. Although users may have to capture additional images, this is offset by the improved workload and efficiency for clinical teams.

Indexed as

Computer-aided diagnosisDeep learningImage Quality AssessmentMedical imagingTeledermatology

Identifiers

PMID39036289
PMCPMC11260318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.