ArticleCureus2024
Fellow Perceptions of Program Culture Conveyed Through Virtual Interviews: Aligning Perceptions With Reality.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDue to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical education training programs had to rapidly switch to a virtual interview (VI) format for the 2021 application cycle. Studies have demonstrated a gap in applicant perceptions of program culture through the VI. The objectives of this study were to assess the perceptions of culture from VIs compared to direct experience after beginning training and explore VI gaps in representing culture. STUDY
designAn anonymous questionnaire was emailed to first-year neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows who participated in the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 VI process. Demographic and interview data and information regarding the presentation of and gaps in the portrayal of program culture through VIs were collected. Responses were evaluated using descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and qualitative analysis.
resultsEighty-five survey responses were received. In determining how well the respondent perceptions of program culture from the VI aligned with their direct experiences, respondent scores showed a median of 80 (scale of 0-100%) with an IQR of 57.5-90. There were significant differences in the perception of fellow-faculty relationships (p = 0.044), the priority placed on fellow teaching (p < 0.001), respect and value for fellows (p = 0.001), and fellow work-life integration (p = 0.004). Nineteen percent of respondents reported not meeting with fellows during their VI and only 15% reported usage of social media in their VI. Respondents noted fellows to be the most important people contributing to perceptions of program culture and provided possible solutions to address challenges in representing culture.
conclusionDespite the small number of respondents, the quantitative and qualitative results offer enlightening information on the gaps in presenting culture through VIs. Notably, the perception of program culture from the VI did not align well with direct experience, particularly in areas addressing fellow relationships and the value placed on fellow teaching, respect, and work-life integration. Increasing fellow involvement, arranging informal settings, and the usage of social media may be important tools to improve accuracy in the representation of culture through VIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.