ArticleCureus2024
A Study of Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Antibiotic Resistance.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public knowledge, beliefs and behaviours related to antimicrobial resistance and antibiotics: a systematic review of studies in high-income countries.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Article
- Using the socio-ecological model in understanding antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic usage in the lakeshore communities of Calamba and Pila, Laguna, Philippines.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Perception of phage therapy and research across selected professional and social groups in Poland.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Antibiotic resistance is a critical global health concern, intensified by public misconceptions and inconsistent antibiotic use. Misunderstandings about antibiotics and their improper use contribute to the acceleration of resistance, making it harder to treat infections effectively. Previous research has identified knowledge gaps in the public, yet there is limited understanding of how these gaps translate into attitudes and practices across different demographic groups. This study aimed to assess the levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding antibiotic resistance among various demographic groups and to determine the influence of demographic factors on these variables. Methods A descriptive study was conducted using a structured online questionnaire distributed through social media and health forums. The questionnaire targeted adults aged 18 years and older from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) for descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analysis. Results The study included responses from 1,561 participants, revealing that 75.72% had knowledge of antibiotic resistance, but only 68.23% understood its public health implications. Attitudes toward antibiotic use were generally positive, with 90.14% recognizing the importance of completing antibiotic courses. However, 32.16% admitted they would stop taking antibiotics once feeling better, even if the course was not finished, highlighting a significant gap between knowledge and practice. Regression analysis identified awareness of prevention measures (coefficient=2.06) and knowledge of antibiotic resistance (coefficient=1.38) as strong predictors of awareness. The chi-square test showed a significant association between gender and awareness of prevention measures (chi-square value=15.19, p-value=0.000097). Conclusions Despite a high level of knowledge about antibiotic resistance, gaps in attitudes and practices persist. These findings underscore the necessity for tailored educational campaigns that not only inform but also engage and alter behaviors across all demographic groups to combat antibiotic resistance effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.