ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Semicircular Canal Function Using Video Head Impulse Test in Patients With Peripheral Vestibular Disorders Without Nystagmus.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing vestibular function in patients with vestibular schwannoma: a comprehensive multi-test vestibular evaluation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to evaluate semicircular canal function using video head impulse test (vHIT) in patients with peripheral vestibular disorders without nystagmus. Methods Patients who underwent vHIT were enrolled in this study, and the proportion of abnormal findings on vHIT in patients without nystagmus was investigated. In addition, the results of vestibular testing were investigated in cases in which both vHIT and caloric testing were performed in patients without nystagmus. Results Forty-six patients (23.4%) of 197 patients who had no abnormal findings on the nystagmus tests, including the gaze nystagmus test, positional nystagmus test, and positioning nystagmus test, showed dysfunction in at least one semicircular canal on vHIT. The most frequent diagnosis was vestibular schwannoma (14/46, 30.4%), and cases with bilateral vestibular dysfunction were also included (12/46, 26.1%). A disorganized pattern of catch-up saccade was observed more frequently in patients with subjective symptoms of dizziness/vertigo compared to those without subjective symptoms. Although the sensitivity of vHIT was low compared to caloric testing, vHIT could detect isolated vertical canal dysfunction not detected by caloric testing. Conclusions vHIT is considered to be a useful test for patients without nystagmus, as vHIT could detect abnormalities in approximately one-quarter of patients without nystagmus. vHIT is considered to be one of the first tests to be performed following nystagmus testing, including the gaze nystagmus test, the positional nystagmus test, and the positioning nystagmus test. On the other hand, there are some cases in which vHIT shows no abnormality while caloric testing shows canal paresis. It is necessary to perform vHIT, bearing in mind that there are abnormalities that cannot be detected by vHIT alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.