Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036075›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2024

Tolerability of a piezoelectric microneedle electroporator in human subjects.

Chao-Yi Lu, Pankaj Rohilla, Eric I Felner, Gaurav Byagathvalli, Erkan Azizoglu, M Saad Bhamla, Mark R Prausnitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chao-Yi LuWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA.
Pankaj RohillaSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-9902
Eric I FelnerSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA.
Gaurav ByagathvalliSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA.
Erkan AzizogluSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA.
M Saad BhamlaSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-9920
Mark R PrausnitzWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9076-8448

Funding

Biophysical mechanism and synthetic engineering of optically-controlled Ca2+-powered supramolecular enginesR35GM142588 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SAAD BHAMLA · 2021 to 2026
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroporation, or the use of electric pulses to facilitate the intracellular delivery of DNA, RNA, and other molecules, is a well-established technique, that has been demonstrated to significantly augment the immunogenicity of DNA/mRNA vaccines and therapeutics. However, the clinical translation of traditional electroporators has been limited due to high costs, large size, complex user operation, and poor tolerability in humans due to nerve stimulation. In prior work, we introduced ePatch: an ultra-low-cost, handheld, battery-free electroporator employing a piezoelectric pulser coupled with a microneedle electrode array that showed enhanced immunogenic responses to an intradermal SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine in mice. The current study shifts focus from efficacy to tolerability, hypothesizing that ePatch's microneedle array, which localizes the electric field to the superficial skin strata, will minimize nerve stimulation and improve patient comfort. We tested this hypothesis in 14 healthy adults, monitoring pain and other potential adverse effects associated with electroporation. Compared to the insertion of a traditional hypodermic needle, the ePatch was less painful. Adverse effects such as pain, tenderness, erythema and swelling at the application sites were minimal, transient, and statistically indistinguishable between the experimental and placebo ePatch application, suggesting excellent tolerability towards electroporation. In summary, ePatch has a favorable tolerability profile in humans and offers the potential for the safe use of electroporation in a variety of clinical settings, including DNA and mRNA vaccination.

Indexed as

DNA/RNA vaccinationelectroporationhuman skin tolerabilitymicroneedle electrode array

Identifiers

PMID39036075
PMCPMC11256137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.