ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2024
Fundamental dermatology education of medical doctors at a regional hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: dermatology is a prevalent field of global health and dermatological conditions are amongst the most frequent complaints affecting communities, yet dermatology has become an overlooked aspect of the medical school curricula and many medical schools have failed to provide doctors with training to manage these conditions confidently and adequately. This study aimed to determine the baseline dermatological knowledge of medical doctors and determine the influence of fundamental dermatology education on hospital medical staff at a regional hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Methods: the knowledge and confidence of 33 medical doctors were tested using a pre-test and post-test quasi-experimental design. Participants completed an online questionnaire followed by an image-based test consisting of 20 questions to determine their level of confidence in diagnosing and managing common dermatological conditions. The participants then attended a sixty-minute educational session based on common dermatological conditions. Following this, their level of confidence and knowledge on the subject was re-assessed using the same online test. Pre and post-intervention confidence and test scores were compared. Results: the pre-intervention test mean score was 67.11%. The post-intervention mean score was 92.50%. The difference between means (post-intervention - pre-intervention) ± SEM was 25.39 ± 4.81. The intervention significantly improved overall test scores (p-value < 0.0001). Many participants felt that their undergraduate training was insufficient in preparing them for the management of common dermatological conditions. Conclusion: the baseline knowledge and confidence of medical doctors in managing common dermatological conditions was poor and such educational interventions have significant value in improving the ability of medical doctors in managing common dermatological conditions. More time should be dedicated to dermatology training at an undergraduate level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.