Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036013›Full record

ReviewExperiments in fluids2024

Cavitation in blunt impact traumatic brain injury.

John D Finan, Thea E Vogt, Yasaman Samei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experiments in fluids, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John D FinanDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4626-9702
Thea E VogtDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
Yasaman SameiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.

Funding

Novel tools for in vitro electrophysiology and neurotrauma modelingR01NS113935 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FINAN, JOHN D · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
Applying human in vitro models to understand the link between trauma and tau pathologyR21NS135179 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FINAN, JOHN D · 2023 to 2023
$457k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113935NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS135179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a major public health challenge. No proven therapies for the condition exist so protective equipment that prevents or mitigates these injuries plays a critical role in minimizing the societal burden of this condition. Our ability to optimize protective equipment depends on our capacity to relate the mechanics of head impact events to morbidity and mortality. This capacity, in turn, depends on correctly identifying the mechanisms of injury. For several decades, a controversial theory of TBI biomechanics has attributed important classes of injury to cavitation inside the cranial vault during blunt impact. This theory explains counter-intuitive clinical observations, including the coup-contre-coup pattern of injury. However, it is also difficult to validate experimentally in living subjects. Also, blunt impact TBI is a broad term that covers a range of different head impact events, some of which may be better described by cavitation theory than others. This review surveys what has been learned about cavitation through mathematical modeling, physical modeling, and experimentation with living tissues and places it in context with competing theories of blunt injury biomechanics and recent research activity in the field in an attempt to understand what the theory has to offer the next generation of innovators in TBI biomechanics.

Identifiers

PMID39036013
PMCPMC11255084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.