ArticleACS omega2024
Biocompatibility Testing of UV-Curable Polydimethylsiloxane for Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell Culture on-a-Chip.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining Operational Limits of Low-Cost MSLA 3D Printing for Microfluidic Systems: Resin Performance, Cell Compatibility, and Fluid Dynamics.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Integrated Ultrasound Device for Precision Bladder Volume Monitoring via Acoustic Focusing and Machine Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Thermoregulable Magnetic Microfluidic Devices by Magnetic Hyperthermia from Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.ACS applied nano materials · 2025Article
- Picosecond Laser Etching of Glass Spiral Microfluidic Channel for Microparticles Dispersion and Sorting.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Polymer Science and Fabrication Processes for Enhanced Microfluidic Applications: An Overview.Micromachines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is extensively used to fabricate biocompatible microfluidic systems due to its favorable properties for cell culture. Recently, ultraviolet-curable PDMS (UV-PDMS) has shown potential for enhancing manufacturing processes and final optical quality while retaining the benefits of traditional thermally cured PDMS. This study investigates the biocompatibility of UV-PDMS under static and flow conditions using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). UV-PDMS samples were treated with oxygen plasma and boiling deionized water to assess potential improvements in cell behavior compared with untreated samples. We evaluated HUVECs adhesion, growth, morphology, and viability in static cultures and microchannels fabricated with UV-PDMS to test their resistance to flow conditions. Our results confirmed the biocompatibility of UV-PDMS for HUVECs culture. Moreover, plasma-oxygen-treated UV-PDMS substrates exhibited superior cell growth and adhesion compared to untreated UV-PDMS. This enhancement enabled HUVECs to maintain their morphology and viability under flow conditions in UV-PDMS microchannels. Additionally, UV-PDMS demonstrated improved optical quality and more efficient handling and processing, characterized by shorter curing times and simplified procedures utilizing UV light compared to traditional PDMS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.