ReviewACS omega2024
Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is widely accepted that deciphering biomolecular structure and function requires going beyond the single-molecule or single-complex paradigm. The densely packed macromolecules, cosolutes, and metabolites in the living cell impose crowding effects on the biomolecular structure and dynamics that need to be accounted for. Molecular simulations have proven to be a powerful tool to advance the current molecular-level understanding of such a highly concentrated, complex milieu. This Mini-Review focuses on summarizing the understanding achieved so far for the effects of crowding on biomolecular processes using computational methods, along with highlighting a new direction in employing crowding as a tool for tunable nanomaterial design. The two schools of thought that form the pillars of the current understanding of crowding effects are discussed. The investigation of crowded solutions using physics-based models that encompass different time and length scales to mimic the intracellular environment are described. The limitations and challenges faced by the current models and simulation methods are addressed, highlighting the gaps to be filled for better agreement with experiments. Crowding can also act as an effective tool to modulate the structure-property-function relationships of nanomaterials, leading to the development of novel functional materials. A few recent studies, mostly experimental, have been summarized in this direction. The Mini-Review concludes with an outlook for future developments in this field in order to enable accurate mimicking of the intracellular environment using simulations and to bridge the gap between biological processes and nanomaterial design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.