ArticleACS omega2024
Application of Low-Salinity Waterflooding in Heavy Oil Sandstone Reservoir: Oil Recovery Efficiency and Mechanistic Study.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Study of Microscopic Flow Mechanisms of Water Huff-n-Puff Considering Salinity Effects.ACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-salinity water injection (LSWI) is a recently emerged and promising technique to enhance oil recovery. In addition, it is attractive due to its relatively low-cost, environmental friendliness, and sustainability. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, and very limited research has been conducted on heavy oil. To verify the feasibility of injecting a low-salinity aquifer water (LSAW) to improve the oil recovery of our target offshore heavy oil reservoir, first, a series of experiments on the core scale, including coreflooding and spontaneous imbibition experiments, were carried out. Furthermore, atomic force microscopy (AFM), contact angle, zeta potential measurement, as well as disjoining pressure calculations based on the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory were carried out to explore the underlying governing mechanism at the microscopic scale. The secondary oil recovery factors of the coreflood tests are 67.11, 70.55, and 77.18% for seawater (SW), produced water (PW), and LSAW, respectively. The additional oil recoveries by LSAW when injected in tertiary modes are 6.38% after SW injection and 5.68% after PW injection. These results indicate that compared with SW and PW which have high brine salinity, the low-salinity brine from the subsurface aquifer (LSAW) can improve oil recovery in both secondary and tertiary modes. In addition, the oil recovery factors from the spontaneous imbibition tests (27.52% by LSAW, 17.32% by PW, and 14.00% by SW) and the insignificant variation of IFTs among the three brines lead to the anticipation that the LSAW can alter the rock to a more water-wet condition compared with SW and PW, thereby giving rise to a higher oil recovery factor in the coreflooding tests. By using AFM imaging and contact angle tests, we proved that the polar asphaltene could desorb from the rock surface and consequently reduce the water contact angle substantially when subjected to low-salinity brine. Furthermore, the zeta potential and the disjoining pressure results indicate that a more repulsive force was developed between oil and the rock under the low-salinity environment, which thereby promotes asphaltene desorption and consequent wettability alteration. Our work has paved the way to apply LSWI to the offshore heavy oil sandstone reservoir.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.