Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39035844›Full record

ArticleLanguage, cognition and neuroscience2021

Direct impact of cognitive control on sentence processing and comprehension.

Nina S Hsu, Stefanie E Kuchinsky, Jared M Novick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Robust Effects of Working Memory Demand during Naturalistic Language Comprehension in Language-Selective Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nina S HsuDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Stefanie E KuchinskyDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Jared M NovickDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Funding

Dynamic behavioral and neural effects of cognitive control on language processingF32HD080306 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HSU, NINA SHEN · 2014 to 2016
$179k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD080306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incremental language processing means that listeners confront temporary ambiguity about how to structure the input, which can generate misinterpretations. In four "visual-world" experiments, we tested whether engaging cognitive control - which detects and resolves conflict - assists revision during comprehension. We recorded listeners' eye-movements and actions while following instructions that were ripe for misanalysis. In Experiments 1 and 3, sentences followed trials from a nonverbal conflict task that manipulated cognitive-control engagement, to test its impact on the ability to revise. To isolate conflict-driven effects of cognitive-control on comprehension, we manipulated attention in a non-conflict task in Experiments 2 and 4. We observed fewer comprehension errors, and earlier revision, when cognitive control (more than attention) was elicited on an immediately preceding trial. These results extend previous correlations between cognitive control and language processing by revealing the influence of domain-general cognitive-control engagement on the temporal unfolding of error-revision processes during language comprehension.

Indexed as

Cognitive controlcomprehensionconflict resolutioneye-movementslanguage processing

Identifiers

PMID39035844
PMCPMC11258758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.