ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2024
Safety of 300IR house dust mite sublingual tablet from pooled clinical trial and post-marketing data.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, DBPC, Multi-national Phase II/III Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Administered as Allergen-based Tablets Once Daily to Adult Patients Suffering From HDM Allergic Rhinitis
A Randomised,Double-blind,Placebo-controlled,Multi National,Phase III Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 300 IR Sublingual Immunotherapy Administered as Allergen-based Tablets Once Daily to Adolescents and Children Above the Age of 5 Years, Suffering From House Dust Mite Allergic Rhinitis
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Ranging Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 100IR, 300IR and 500IR Sublingual Tablets of House Dust Mite Allergen for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis in an Environmental Exposure Chamber Model
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study of the Efficacy and Safety of STG320 Sublingual Tablets of House Dust Mite (HDM) Allergen Extracts in Adults and Adolescents With HDM-associated Allergic Rhinitis
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis: Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analytical Evidence.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Allergic rhinitis activity and efficacy of 300 IR house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablet in pediatrics.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Trial
- Post-marketing safety evaluation and objective benefit-risk assessment of sublingual immunotherapy tablets in allergic rhinitis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Characterization of a major house dust mite allergen Der p 22 among Malaysian adult population.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The 300IR house dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet is approved for treatment of HDM-induced allergic rhinitis (AR). To provide a comprehensive review of the 300IR HDM-SLIT tablet safety profile based on randomized controlled trial (RCT) pooled data and post-marketing (PM) pharmacovigilance data. Methods: Subjects (5-65 years) with confirmed HDM-AR with or without controlled asthma were treated with 300IR or placebo in 8 RCTs. Reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were pooled and analyzed descriptively in subsets of adults/adolescents and children. Adverse reactions (ADRs) collected from spontaneous reporting and PM studies through a pharmacovigilance system since the first marketing authorization were also analyzed. Results: Across RCTs, 1853 subjects were treated with the 300IR HDM-SLIT tablet and 1846 with placebo. In both subsets of adults/adolescents and children whichever their asthma status, treatment-related TEAEs of higher incidence in active groups vs placebo were mostly consistent with mild or moderate local application-site reactions. They were mainly reported on the first days of treatment and decreased over time. 4 severe laryngopharyngeal reactions (2 requiring adrenaline/epinephrine) and 1 moderate eczema considered serious rapidly resolved with medications; no anaphylaxis was reported. In PM settings, ADRs reported in more than 235,000 patients were in line with RCT findings. Severe systemic reactions occurred rarely; 12 anaphylactic reactions resolved safely (5 with adrenaline). No new safety signal was raised. Conclusion: Safety data from RCTs and more than 7 years of real-life experience confirmed the favorable safety profile of 300IR HDM-SLIT tablet in patients across different regions, regardless of age and asthma status. Clinical trial registrations: NCT00674700; Retrospectively registered 06 May 2008.NCT01199133; Retrospectively registered 09 September 2010.NCT01527188; Retrospectively registered 01 February 2012.NCT02443805; Registered 29 April 2015/EudraCT 2014-004223-46; Registered 16 September 2015.jRCT2080221872/JapicCTI-121917; Registered 01 August 2012.jRCT2080222929/JapicCTI-15298; Registered 04 August 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.