ArticleCHEST critical care2024
Circulating Biomarkers of Endothelial Dysfunction Associated With Ventilatory Ratio and Mortality in ARDS Resulting From SARS-CoV-2 Infection Treated With Antiinflammatory Therapies.
Article in CHEST critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Insights into Clinical, Molecular, and Therapeutic Approaches to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrated Analysis of Parenchymal and Vascular HRCT Patterns with Circulating Biomarkers in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of the National Early Warning Score Combined with Nutritional and Endothelial Stress Indices for Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Circulating and Respiratory Biomarkers in Sepsis-Induced ARDS: Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights - A Narrative Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Role of Tie-2 Axis in Sepsis: A Potential Therapeutic Target.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe association of plasma biomarkers and clinical outcomes in ARDS resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection predate the evidence-based use of immunomodulators. RESEARCH QUESTION: Which plasma biomarkers are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection treated routinely with immunomodulators? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe collected plasma from patients with ARDS resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection within 24 h of admission to the ICU between December 2020 and March 2021 (N = 69). We associated 16 total biomarkers of inflammation (eg, IL-6), coagulation (eg, D-dimer), epithelial injury (eg, surfactant protein D), and endothelial injury (eg, angiopoietin-2) with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality and secondary outcome of ventilatory ratio (at baseline and day 3).
resultsThirty patients (43.5%) died within 60 days. All patients received corticosteroids and 6% also received tocilizumab. Compared with survivors, nonsurvivors demonstrated a higher baseline modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (median, 8.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 7-9] vs 7 [IQR, 5-8]);
interpretationBiomarkers of inflammation, coagulation, and epithelial injury were not associated with clinical outcomes in a small cohort of patients with ARDS uniformly treated with immunomodulators. However, endothelial biomarkers, including plasma NEDD9, were associated with 60-day mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.