ReviewHealth science reports2024
Effectiveness of adalimumab in severe ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Review in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world utility of platelet count, hemoglobin, and iron levels as predictors of clinical response to vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: a retrospective, single-center study in Poland.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Kangfuxin liquid enema plus adalimumab for ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Review
- Immune cell senescence in autoimmunity: implications for disease pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Xuesanqi ameliorates DSS-induced colitis in mice by mediating gut microbiota dysbiosis and modulating MAPK/ERK/JNK pathway.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of adalimumab in severe ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.Health science reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Ulcerative colitis (UC) causes chronic inflammation in the digestive tract, leading to abdominal pain and diarrhea. Adalimumab, a monoclonal antibody, is used to treat moderate to severe cases. This review and meta-analysis evaluated adalimumab's effectiveness for severe UC, considering patient age, disease duration, and gender. Methods: This study was designed as a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Articles were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases based on the keywords of adalimumab and UC. The titles, the abstracts, and, if necessary, the full texts of the articles were read. Then for further review, the full texts of the related articles were carefully examined, and the final articles were selected. Seventy-eight articles were searched based on the keywords, and after reading the articles, 50 articles were related to the topic of the dissertation. The 50 articles were evaluated critically based on a checklist prepared by a statistical consultant and four articles with a score above 70% were selected. In the four articles, the main indicators of the effectiveness of adalimumab, including mucosal healing, clinical remission, and clinical response, were evaluated. Results: The effectiveness of adalimumab on the mucosal healing index was 75.40%, the clinical remission index was 70.79%, and the clinical response index was 83.02%, based on different doses and treatment durations in the study. In the four meta-analysis studies on adalimumab's effectiveness, 1613 UC patients were treated with varying doses over 8 and 52 weeks. Based on a meta-analysis over 8 and 52 weeks for treating moderate to severe UC, adalimumab's effectiveness was 70%-83%. The highest effectiveness, based on three main indices, was with a 40 mg dose over 52 weeks. Conclusion: According to the meta-analysis, the effectiveness of adalimumab for treating moderate to severe UC over 8 and 52 weeks was 70%-83%. The highest effectiveness, based on three main indices, was with a 40 mg dose over 52 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.