ArticleCureus2024
The Impact of Vitamin D Deficiency on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Risk: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin D and Diabetes: Exploring the Link, Prevention, and Management.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy and Maternal and Neonatal Vitamin D Status at ≤32 Weeks Gestation: Romanian Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Vitamin D and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the IEU OpenGWAS Project: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Endocrine roles of vitamin D in female reproduction: Mechanisms and clinical implications.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Nowadays, there has been growing attention to vitamin D deficiency's impact on women of reproductive age, both during pregnancy and the preconception period. Because of its possible impact on female reproductive ability, vitamin D deficiency may have multiple implications for maternal and fetal health. Currently, the correlation between vitamin D deficiency and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is gaining attention, mainly due to contradictory findings in the literature. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective study involving data from 106 pregnant women to establish a possible link between vitamin D deficiency and GDM risk. We analyzed variables such as vitamin D status, the occurrence of gestational diabetes, and body mass index to identify significant statistical correlations among them. Results Within our study group, the average vitamin D level was 19.5 ± 7.8 ng/mL. Regarding vitamin D status, 59 (55.7%) pregnant women had vitamin D deficiency, 36 (34%) had vitamin D insufficiency, and 11 (10.4%) had optimal vitamin D levels. GDM was diagnosed in 18 cases, representing 17%. After the statistical analysis, we found a positive correlation between gestational diabetes and vitamin D deficiency (chi-square = 4.472, p = 0.049). However, we did not find a significant correlation between gestational diabetes and optimal vitamin D status. Conclusions Pregnant women with vitamin D deficiency are at an increased risk of developing GDM and may benefit from vitamin D supplementation. We believe that further research is necessary to have a comprehensive understanding of vitamin D's effects on pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.