ArticleHeliyon2024
Heavy metal concentrations in drinking water sources in two mining districts in Ghana.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive sub-chronic toxicological profiling of illegal artisanal small-scale mining-polluted river bodies in four regions of Ghana.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Neurotoxicity of heavy metals across the lifespan: The beneficial role of nutrition from fetus to the elderly.Advances in neurotoxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
- In Ghana, mining of minerals at small-scale and large-scale is widespread across many districts, leading to significant heavy metal pollution in the environment. In this study, the concentrations of iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg) in the different drinking water samples collected from households, institutions, water points and surface water in two mining districts namely the Wassa East and Asutifi North were analyzed. The water types collected included boreholes, wells, piped water into yards, public standpipes, rainwater, sachet water, and surface water. The results indicated that the levels of Fe and Mn were higher than As and Hg in all the drinking water samples. The levels of As and Hg in drinking water from households and institutions were higher in the Wassa East district compared to the Asutifi North district. However, the metal levels at water points were similar in both districts. In surface water, Fe levels were higher in the Wassa East district compared to the Asutifi North district with median values of 1243 μg/L and 860 μg/L for the Wassa East and Asutifi North districts, respectively. In contrast, the Mn levels were higher in the Asutifi North district than the Wassa East district with median values of 9.5 μg/L and 90 μg/L for Wassa East and Asutifi North districts, respectively. All the metals (Mn, As, and Hg) studied except Fe were within the recommended WHO level. The Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI) values for the different water types in households, institutions and water points were all below the critical limit of 100. The Water Quality Index (WQI) indicates that the boreholes, piped water into yards, and public standpipes in both districts were classified as excellent or good, making them suitable for drinking. However, the wells and surface water in both districts were classified as very poor and unfit for drinking, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.