Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39035524›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Religious minority status and risk of hypertension in women: Evidence from Bangladesh.

Biplab Kumar Datta, Sanjoy Kumar Chowdhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Biplab Kumar DattaInstitute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Sanjoy Kumar ChowdhuryHealth Education North West, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrimination based on religion and communal violence against religious minorities have been on the rise worldwide. Despite growing incidences of violence against religious minorities, little is known on the relationship between minority status and population health outcomes in the low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). This study intends to fill this gap by assessing the prevalence of hypertension among religious minority women in Bangladesh, a South Asian country with high levels of social hostilities involving religion. Using data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017-18, we examined whether religious minority women had a differential risk of having hypertension. We estimated logistic regression models to obtain the odds in favor of being hypertensive among women aged 18-49 years and compared the odds for religious minority women with that of their non-minority counterparts. We then estimated linear regression models to examine how average systolic- and diastolic-blood pressure measures differ across minority and non-minority women. We found that the odds of being hypertensive for minority women were 1.43 (95 % CI: 1.14-1.79) times that of their non-minority counterparts. The adjusted odds ratio was very similar, 1.45 (95 % CI: 1.14-1.84), when various sociodemographic and other risk factors were accounted for. The conditional average SBP and DBP levels were respectively 3.42 mmHg (95 % CI: 1.64-5.20) and 1.44 mmHg (95 % CI: 0.37-2.51) higher among minority women. Thus, we found evidence that religious minority women in Bangladesh had a disproportionately higher risk of having hypertension compared to their non-minority peers. These results call for further research on psychological distress from systematic discrimination and collective trauma among religious minorities in Bangladesh.

Indexed as

BangladeshCollective traumaCommunal violenceHypertensionReligious minority

Identifiers

PMID39035524
PMCPMC11259843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.