ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparative study of acute and chronic pain after inflatable videoasisted MediastinoscopicTranshiatal esophagectomy and minimally invasive McKeown Esophagectomy:A propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tegileridine versus Oliceridine for Acute Postoperative Pain Management in Patients After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- A Clinical nomogram for predicting chronic postsurgical pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Single-sterilization modified-position robotic-assisted McKeown esophagectomy versus minimally invasive approach after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The short-term quality of life of patients can be enhanced by performing Inflatable Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopic Transhiatal Esophagectomy (IVMTE). Nevertheless, there is limited research on how it impacts postoperative acute and chronic pain in individuals diagnosed with esophageal cancer.Hence, this research aimed to examine the impact of IVMTE and minimally invasive Mckeown esophagectomy (MIME) on the occurrence of acute and chronic pain following surgery in individuals diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Methods: A retrospective, propensity score matching analysis was adopted. In total, 133 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent IVMTE and MIME between January 2020 and December 2021 were part of the study. Among them, 38 patients underwent IVMTE and 95 patients underwent MIME. Following the propensity score matching analysis, 36 patients were included in each group. Patients' postoperative pain was evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: The IVMTE group (Group A) had significantly reduced operation time and intraoperative blood loss compared to the MIME group (Group B) (P < 0.05). NRS scores on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th days after surgery, as well as on the 3rd and 6th months post-surgery, were notably reduced in the IVMTE group (Group A) compared to the MIME group (Group B) (P < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that chronic pain occurred postoperative 3rd months was related to the operation methods (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that chronic pain occurred postoperative 6th months was related to the operation time, postoperative 14th days NRS scores and operation methods (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that chronic pain occurred postoperative 6th months was related to the operation methods (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The results showed that the operation methods were the main risk factors for postoperative chronic pain. The compared with MIME, IVMTE can further reduce the acute and chronic pain of patients with esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.