ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Association between gender and self-assessment skills amongst Japanese dental students.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validity and Reliability of Rubrics for Assessment of Preclinical Orthodontic Practices in Dental Students.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Student Self-Assessments in Clinical Operative Dentistry: Bridging Perception and Performance.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Rubric system for the evaluation of root canal treatment of single canal tooth performed by preclinical dental students: a cross-sectional study.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Article
- Factors influencing the agreement between teachers and students in the assessment of preclinical endodontics using a rubric.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Using an analytic rubric system for the evaluation of anterior ceramic crown preparation performed by preclinical dental students.PloS one · 2025Article
- Precision dentistry in preclinical education: analytic rubrics for enhanced objectivity in metal-ceramic crown preparations.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Students' performance in clinical class II composite restorations: a case study using analytic rubrics.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Self-assessment in dental education is considered a fundamental skill for proficient oral healthcare providers. While previous studies looked at self-assessment in education, few have done so at Japanese institutions. This study aimed to assess potential associations between gender and self-assessment skills in Japanese dental students. Materials and methods: Dental students from Niigata University (n = 301) completed preclinical prosthodontic exercises and self-assessed their practical exam performance. Three calibrated faculty evaluated students' work using the same rubric. The difference between student self-assessment score and mean faculty grade was defined as the student-faculty (S-F) gap, indicating how accurately students evaluated their work. The gap scores were stratified by quartiles by faculty grade and by gender. Regression analysis was used to investigate potential associations. Results: Students mean S-F gap was 2.9 ± 10.5 % with a significant negative association to faculty grades (coefficient, -0.32; Conclusion: Niigata University students generally overestimated their performance. Students with higher faculty grades self-assessed themselves more accurately than students with lower faculty grades. Gender did not influence S-F gaps, despite dentistry in Japan shifting toward a female-dominated field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.