ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Case series: successful salvage from refractory cardiogenic shock caused by COVID-19-associated myocardial injury with temporary ventricular assist devices.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- COVID-19-Associated Sepsis: Potential Role of Phytochemicals as Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is predominantly known to cause respiratory injury; however, the present case series highlights four instances in which the infection resulted in significant cardiac complications. Among such cases, some represent severe cardiogenic shock, which necessitates the immediate introduction of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for salvage. Case summary: This case series involved patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury leading to fulminant cardiogenic shock. These patients required immediate implementation of peripheral MCS, followed by an instant upgrade to a central MCS system due to anatomical limitations and severe biventricular dysfunction. Central MCS provided effective ventricular unloading, resulting in a significant and prompt improvement in ventricular function. The treatment timeline showed rapid deterioration followed by remarkable recovery within 2 weeks of MCS initiation, demonstrating the effectiveness of aggressive and tailored MCS strategies in managing severe COVID-19-related cardiac complications. Discussion: This study provides significant insights into the cardiovascular implications of COVID-19, particularly in the context of severe myocardial injury that leads to cardiogenic shock. The report underscores the importance of early recognition and intervention in such cases, focusing on the use of MCS as a life-saving modality. The findings also revealed unique pathological features of COVID-19-associated myocardial injury, including macrophage-predominant infiltration and microthrombosis, which are distinct from the features of conventional myocarditis. These findings highlight the need for further research on the pathophysiology of COVID-19-related cardiac injuries and the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.