Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39035235›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2024

Development of an online tool to support financial and legal planning in dementia.

Irene Tessaro, Sarah M Hooper, Denise Watt, David Menestres, David Farrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irene TessaroPeople Designs, Inc, 1304 Broad St., Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Sarah M HooperUC College of the Law San Francisco, 200 McAllister St., San Francisco, CA 94102, USA.
Denise WattUC College of the Law San Francisco, 200 McAllister St., San Francisco, CA 94102, USA.
David MenestresPeople Designs, Inc, 1304 Broad St., Durham, NC 27705, USA.
David FarrellPeople Designs, Inc, 1304 Broad St., Durham, NC 27705, USA.

Funding

An eHealth platform to facilitate financial understanding and legal preparation for patients with dementia and their caregiversR44AG074131 · NIA · PEOPLE DESIGNS, INC. · PI FARRELL, DAVID · 2021 to 2023
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R44 AG074131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop, assess, and refine an online educational tool, Plan for Clarity, to support financial and legal planning in dementia. Methods: A Delphi mixed-method study with three rounds of anonymous review by lay and professional stakeholders was designed to reach consensus about the content of the online tool and explore the socio-cultural and behavioral factors that could affect access and use. Results: Consensus showed that the online tool covered key information, knowledge, and communication skills for financial and legal planning. Study themes: 1) the online tool had to be easy to navigate with relevant, easily understood information; 2) people with early signs of memory difficulties would be able to use the tool; 3) a referral from a trusted source is a primary way to facilitate access and use of the tool; and 4) discussions about financial and legal issues should be held early, ahead of barriers that can block discussion. Conclusion: These data suggest this online tool is relevant and feasible for dementia care and support as well as aging more generally. Innovation: Plan for Clarity is innovative as an evidence and theory-driven online education tool to address financial and legal planning for dementia care, particularly among underserved older adults.

Indexed as

Alzheimer'sDelphiDementiaFeasibilityFinancial and legal care planningMixed methodsOnline toolSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39035235
PMCPMC11259804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.