ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2024
Regional variation in bone mineral density of the distal radius.
Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study investigates the regional variation in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the distal radius, a critical site for osteoporosis-related fractures. Understanding aBMD distribution is essential for accurate diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Methods: The study involved 261 participants aged over 50. Using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, aBMD was recorded across contiguous regions of the distal radius. Factors considered include age, sex, and hand dominance, providing a comprehensive view of aBMD distribution. Results: The findings indicated a consistent pattern in aBMD distribution along the radius, with a plateau around the one-third distance from the wrist. Notably, significant differences in aBMD were observed between age groups, especially among post-menopausal women. The study also recorded minor variations in aBMD between dominant and non-dominant forearms. Conclusions: The study's insights into aBMD variation at the distal radius have implications for osteoporosis research and clinical diagnosis. It highlights the importance of standardized region of interest placement in DXA scans for accurate assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.