Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39035186›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Safe(r)-by-design principles in the thermoplastics industry: guidance on release assessment during manufacture of nano-enabled products.

Polly McLean, James Hanlon, Apostolos Salmatonidis, Karen S Galea, Finlay Brooker, Cristiano Citterio, Daniele Magni, Socorro Vázquez-Campos, Davide Lotti, Matthew S P Boyles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Polly McLeanInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
James HanlonInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Apostolos SalmatonidisLEITAT Technological Center, Terrassa, Spain.
Karen S GaleaInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Finlay BrookerInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Cristiano CitterioLATI Industria Termoplastici S.p.A., Vedano Olona, Italy.
Daniele MagniLATI Industria Termoplastici S.p.A., Vedano Olona, Italy.
Socorro Vázquez-CamposLEITAT Technological Center, Terrassa, Spain.
Davide LottiLATI Industria Termoplastici S.p.A., Vedano Olona, Italy.
Matthew S P BoylesInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The application of nanomaterials (NMs) and nano-enabled products (NEPs) across many industries has been extensive and is still expanding decades after first being identified as an emerging technology. Additive manufacturing has been greatly impacted and has seen the benefits of integrating NMs within products. With the expansion of nanotechnology, there has been a need to develop more adaptive and responsive methods to ascertain risks and ensure technology is developed safely. The Safe(r)-by-Design (SbD) concept can be used to establish safe parameters and minimise risks during the materials' lifecycle, including the early stages of the supply chain. Exposure monitoring has advanced in recent years with the creation of standardised protocols for occupational exposure assessment of nano-objects and their aggregates and agglomerates (NOAA). Methods: To aid in the development of an online SbD-supporting platform by the EU-funded project SAbyNA, we adopt a Europe Standard for monitoring release of NOAA to identify if a greater release of NOAA is associated with incorporation of NMs within NEPs compared to a polymer matrix alone. Case studies included filaments of polypropylene (PP) with nano-Ag or polycarbonate (PC) with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). NMs were received in masterbatch, and therefore previously modified to align with SbD interventions. Results were collected in line with European Standard recommendations: monitoring particle concentrations using direct reading instruments (DRI), sampling for offline chemical and morphological analysis, and collecting contextual information. Results and discussion: Based on the criteria described in the European standard (BS EN 17058), data from both case studies identified that inhalation exposure relating to NM was "unlikely". Despite this, during the production of the SWCNT-PC filaments, some noteworthy observations were made, including several DRI activity measurements shown to be higher than background levels, and material morphologically similar to the reference SWCNT/polymeric masterbatch observed in offline analysis. The data collected during this campaign were used to discuss choices available for data interpretation and decision-making in the European Standard for monitoring release of NOAA and also to facilitate the development of SAbyNA's user-friendly industry platform for the SbD of NMs and NEPs.

Indexed as

NanostructuresOccupational ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringEuropeHumansNanotechnologyNanotubes, CarbonPlasticsPolycarboxylate CementPolypropylenesNanotubes, CarbonPlasticspolycarbonatePolycarboxylate CementPolypropylenes3D printingadditive manufacturingexposure assessmentnano-enabled products (NEPs)nanomaterialsnano-objectsnanoparticlessafe(r)-by-design (SbD)

Identifiers

PMID39035186
PMCPMC11257848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.