ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2024
Level of client satisfaction among family planning service users in semi-pastoralist areas of Southeast Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Woman-centeredness of family planning care and associated factors in a semi-urban health district in West Cameroon.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Exploring client satisfaction and determinants of family planning services at public health facilities in Debre Tabor town, Northwest Ethiopia: a mixed-method study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Client satisfaction with family planning services is a crucial metric for gauging healthcare providers' performance. There is a dearth of local data that explores the factors that influence clients' satisfaction with family planning services in semi-pastoral areas using a mixed-methods approach. This study aimed to assess the level of client satisfaction and its associated factors among family planning service users in six public health centers in Southeast Ethiopia. Methods: A multi-centered, concurrent, mixed-method survey using quantitative and qualitative methods was conducted in six public health centers in Southeast Ethiopia from March 15 to April 16, 2022. Four hundred nineteen systematically selected family planning method users and their respective six family planning service providers were approached using a purposive sampling technique. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify the independent factors associated with clients' satisfaction with family planning services. Results: Four hundred fourteen study participants were finally approached, and client satisfaction with family planning services in those centers was 57.5% with a 95% CI of 52.71%-62.71%. Being in the age group of 25-34 years (AOR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.2, 3.29), married (AOR = 2.41; 95% CI 1.13, 5.15), waiting less than 30 min (AOR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.11, 2.72), and receiving the family planning method they want (AOR = 2.35; 95% CI 1.16, 4.76) were positively associated with client satisfaction. Updating the provider's skills and knowledge, keeping clients' method choices, and leaving free decisions also increased client satisfaction. Conclusions: In this study, client satisfaction with family planning services remains low. Users' age, marital status, waiting time, and wish to receive the method they want were positively associated with client satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.