ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Optimizing neurointerventional procedures: an algorithm for embolization coil detection and automated collimation to enable dose reduction.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Striving to Improve Image Quality and Minimize Radiation Dose in Neurointerventional Procedures.Neurointervention · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Monitoring radiation dose and time parameters during radiological interventions is crucial, especially in neurointerventional procedures, such as aneurysm treatment with embolization coils. The algorithm presented detects the presence of these embolization coils in medical images. It establishes a bounding box as a reference for automated collimation, with the primary objective being to enhance the efficiency and safety of neurointerventional procedures by actively optimizing image quality while minimizing patient dose. Methods: Two distinct methodologies are evaluated in our study. The first involves deep learning, employing the Faster R-CNN model with a ResNet-50 FPN as a backbone and a RetinaNet model. The second method utilizes a classical blob detection approach, serving as a benchmark for comparison. Results: We performed a fivefold cross-validation, and our top-performing model achieved mean mAP@75 of 0.84 across all folds on validation data and mean mAP@75 of 0.94 on independent test data. Since we use an upscaled bounding box, achieving 100% overlap between ground truth and prediction is not necessary. To highlight the real-world applications of our algorithm, we conducted a simulation featuring a coil constructed from an alloy wire, effectively showcasing the implementation of automatic collimation. This resulted in a notable reduction in the dose area product, signifying the reduction of stochastic risks for both patients and medical staff by minimizing scatter radiation. Additionally, our algorithm assists in avoiding extreme brightness or darkness in X-ray angiography images during narrow collimation, ultimately streamlining the collimation process for physicians. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this marks the initial attempt at an approach successfully detecting embolization coils, showcasing the extended applications of integrating detection results into the X-ray angiography system. The method we present has the potential for broader application, allowing its extension to detect other medical objects utilized in interventional procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.