Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39035046›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of plant sciences2024

Defining fitness in evolutionary ecology.

Susana M Wadgymar, Seema Sheth, Emily Josephs, Megan DeMarche, Jill Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of plant sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The value of consciousness: experiences worth having.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susana M WadgymarBiology Department, Davidson College.
Seema ShethDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University.
Emily JosephsDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University.
Megan DeMarcheDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia.
Jill AndersonDepartment of Genetics & Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia.

Funding

Determining the evolutionary forces shaping genotype-by-environment interactionsR35GM142829 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPHS, EMILY · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An understanding of biological fitness is central to theory and practice in ecology and evolution, yet fitness remains an elusive concept to define and challenging to measure accurately. Fitness reflects an individual's ability to pass its alleles on to subsequent generations. Researchers often quantify proxies for fitness, such as survival, growth or reproductive success. However, it can be difficult to determine lifetime fitness, especially for species with long lifespans. The abiotic and biotic environment strongly affects the expression of fitness, which means that fitness components can vary through both space and time. This spatial and temporal heterogeneity results in the impressive range of adaptations that we see in nature. Here, we review definitions of fitness and approaches to measuring fitness at the level of genes, individuals, genotypes, and populations and highlight that fitness is a key concept linking ecological and evolutionary thought.

Indexed as

component of fitnesslife historypopulation growth rateselection coefficienttrade-offvital rate

Identifiers

PMID39035046
PMCPMC11257499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.