Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39035034›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024

Uterine displacement as fertility sparing technique for pelvic malignancies: Demonstration of the surgical options on a human cadaver.

Matteo Pavone, Lise Lecointre, Barbara Seeliger, Nicolò Bizzarri, Jacques Marescaux, Giovanni Scambia, Cherif Akladios, Denis Querleu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matteo PavoneInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
Lise LecointreInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
Barbara SeeligerInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
Nicolò BizzarriUOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Jacques MarescauxIRCAD, Research Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD) France, Strasbourg, France.
Giovanni ScambiaUOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Cherif AkladiosDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Denis QuerleuInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservation of fertility without compromising oncological outcomes is a major objective in young patients at the time of cancer treatment (Azaïs et al., 2018, Bizzarri et al., 2022). Radio(chemo)therapy is often required in pelvic malignancies (anus, rectum, sarcoma). Direct irradiation results in a damage to ovarian (Bizzarri et al., 2023) and endometrial function (Lohynska et al., 2021), compromising the fertility of female patients of reproductive age. While ovarian transposition is an established method to move the ovaries away from the radiation field (Morice et al., 2022, Pavone et al., 2023), corresponding surgical procedures displacing the uterus are investigational (Pavone et al., 2023, Querleu et al., 2010, Ribeiro et al., 2017, Ribeiro et al., 2024). In a human female cadaver model, the reported laparoscopic techniques of uterine displacement were carried out to demonstrate their feasibility and the step-by-step surgical techniques. The surgeries were performed in a hybrid operating room which enables to perform CT-scan and evaluate the uterine positions according to anatomical landmarks. The following procedures were performed in the same cadaveric model and were described in the video: 1. Uterine suspension of the round ligaments to the abdominal wall 2. Uterine ventrofixation of the fundus at the level of the umbilical line 3. Uterine transposition according to the technique reported by Ribeiro et al. All procedures were completed without technical complications. All of these uterine displacement procedures are technically feasible. Uterine transposition is the most technically complex procedure, and its effectiveness in protecting the endometrium should be evaluated in comparison to the simpler techniques (Table 1). Future studies incorporating radiotherapy simulations are needed to define which technique represents the best compromise between surgical complexity and positioning the uterus at a level that receives the lowest possible radiation dose.

Indexed as

Pelvic cancerRadiotherapyUterine displacementUterine suspensionUterine transpositionUterine ventrofixation

Identifiers

PMID39035034
PMCPMC11259779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.