Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39035011›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024

Autoantibodies in COVID-19 survivors with post-COVID symptoms: a systematic review.

Kin Israel Notarte, Timothy Hudson David Culasino Carandang, Jacqueline Veronica Velasco, Adriel Pastrana, Abbygail Therese Ver, Gerald Neil Manalo, Jeremy Ace Ng, Steven Grecia, Giuseppe Lippi, Brandon Michael Henry and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kin Israel NotarteDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Timothy Hudson David Culasino CarandangPamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila College of Medicine, Manila, Philippines.
Jacqueline Veronica VelascoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardinal Santos Medical Center, San Juan, Philippines.
Adriel PastranaFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Abbygail Therese VerFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Gerald Neil ManaloFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Jeremy Ace NgCollege of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Steven GreciaFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Brandon Michael HenryClinical Laboratory, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Madrid, OH, United States.
César Fernández-de-Las-PeñasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The long-lasting persistence of autoantibodies stands as one of the hypotheses explaining the multisystemic manifestations seen in individuals with post-COVID-19 condition. The current review offers restricted insights into the persistence of autoantibodies in plasma/serum in people with post-COVID symptoms. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, as well as on medRxiv and bioRxiv preprint servers were searched up to January 5 Results: From 162 identified records, five articles met all inclusion criteria; four studies included infected controls with no post-COVID symptoms whereas all five studies included non-infected controls (410 COVID-19 survivors with post-COVID symptoms, 223 COVID-19 survivors with no post-COVID symptoms as controls and 266 non-infected healthy controls). Four studies concluded that the presence of autoantibodies had a potential (but small) role in post-COVID-19 condition whereas one study concluded that autoantibodies were not associated. Quality assessment showed all studies had high methodological quality. Conclusion: Although evidence suggests that persistent autoantibodies can be associated with post-COVID symptoms, the clinical relevance of their presence seems modest at this stage. Current results highlight further research to clarify the role of autoantibodies in the development of post-COVID symptoms, guiding the development of tailored diagnostic and treatment approaches to enhance patient outcomes. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/vqz28.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2SurvivorsHumansAutoantibodiesautoantibodieslong COVIDPASCpost-COVID-19SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19)

Identifiers

PMID39035011
PMCPMC11257835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.