Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39034991›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Deep learning-enabled classification of kidney allograft rejection on whole slide histopathologic images.

Yongrong Ye, Liubing Xia, Shicong Yang, You Luo, Zuofu Tang, Yuanqing Li, Lanqing Han, Hanbin Xie, Yong Ren, Ning Na

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yongrong YeDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Liubing XiaDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shicong YangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
You LuoDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zuofu TangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanqing LiSchool of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Lanqing HanCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Research Institute of Tsinghua, Pearl River Delta, Guangzhou, China.
Hanbin XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yong RenScientific Research Project Department, Guangdong Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy Laboratory (Guangzhou), Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou, China.
Ning NaDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of kidney transplant rejection currently relies on manual histopathological assessment, which is subjective and susceptible to inter-observer variability, leading to limited reproducibility. We aim to develop a deep learning system for automated assessment of whole-slide images (WSIs) from kidney allograft biopsies to enable detection and subtyping of rejection and to predict the prognosis of rejection. Method: We collected H&E-stained WSIs of kidney allograft biopsies at 400x magnification from January 2015 to September 2023 at two hospitals. These biopsy specimens were classified as T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and other lesions based on the consensus reached by two experienced transplant pathologists. To achieve feature extraction, feature aggregation, and global classification, we employed multi-instance learning and common convolution neural networks (CNNs). The performance of the developed models was evaluated using various metrics, including confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve (AUC), classification map, heat map, and pathologist-machine confrontations. Results: In total, 906 WSIs from 302 kidney allograft biopsies were included for analysis. The model based on multi-instance learning enables detection and subtyping of rejection, named renal rejection artificial intelligence model (RRAIM), with the overall 3-category AUC of 0.798 in the independent test set, which is superior to that of three transplant pathologists under nearly routine assessment conditions. Moreover, the prognosis models accurately predicted graft loss within 1 year following rejection and treatment response for rejection, achieving AUC of 0.936 and 0.756, respectively. Conclusion: We first developed deep-learning models utilizing multi-instance learning for the detection and subtyping of rejection and prediction of rejection prognosis in kidney allograft biopsies. These models performed well and may be useful in assisting the pathological diagnosis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGraft RejectionKidney TransplantationAdultAllograftsBiopsyFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultsartificial intelligencehematoxylin eosin-stained slideskidney transplantationpathological assessmentrenal rejection

Identifiers

PMID39034991
PMCPMC11257957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.