ArticleCirculation research2024
Biological and Procedural Predictors of Outcome in the Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network (SPAN) Trial.
Article in Circulation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving physiological monitoring and reporting standards in preclinical stroke research.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- A Ubiquitous Blood Flow Biomarker to Calculate Hypoxic-Ischemic Depolarization Latency in a Mouse Model of Focal Ischemic Stroke: Insight Into Metabolic and Electrophysiological Resilience.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Knockdown of endothelial Serpine1 improves stroke recovery by attenuating peri-infarct blood flow and blood-brain barrier disruption.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Photothrombotic and middle cerebral artery occlusion models produce distinct neurovascular injury and sex-dependent outcomes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Peripheral inhibition of IL-6 signaling with tocilizumab improves stroke outcomes in aged mice but requires sex-specific dosing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Exploring Sex Differences in Stroke Outcomes: A Comprehensive Analysis From the SPAN 1 Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Smooth Muscle Dysfunction Drives Cerebrovascular Reserve Failure and End-Organ Brain Injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Toward development of a dynamic supramolecular peptide therapy for acute ischemic stroke.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Treatment with Manganese Porphyrin, MnTnBuOE-2-PyPPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor desidustat improves stroke outcomes via enhancing efferocytosis in mice with chronic kidney disease.Experimental neurology · 2025Article
- A robust and reproducible automated MRI pipeline for quantifying tissue outcomes after experimental stroke in multi-center preclinical networks.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe SPAN trial (Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network) is the largest preclinical study testing acute stroke interventions in experimental focal cerebral ischemia using endovascular filament middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo). Besides testing interventions against controls, the prospective design captured numerous biological and procedural variables, highlighting the enormous heterogeneity introduced by the multicenter structure that might influence stroke outcomes. Here, we leveraged the unprecedented sample size achieved by the SPAN trial and the prospective design to identify the biological and procedural variables that affect experimental stroke outcomes in transient endovascular filament MCAo.
methodsThe study cohort included all mice enrolled and randomized in the SPAN trial (N=1789). Mice were subjected to 60-minute MCAo and followed for a month. Thirteen biological and procedural independent variables and 4 functional (weight loss and 4-point neuroscore on days 1 and 2, corner test on days 7 and 28, and mortality) and 3 tissue (day 2, magnetic resonance imaging infarct volumes and swelling; day 30, magnetic resonance imaging tissue loss) outcome variables were prospectively captured. Multivariable regression with stepwise elimination was used to identify the predictors and their effect sizes.
resultsOlder age, active circadian stage at MCAo, and thinner and longer filament silicone tips predicted higher mortality. Older age, larger body weight, longer anesthesia duration, and longer filament tips predicted worse neuroscores, while high-fat diet and blood flow monitoring predicted milder neuroscores. Older age and a high-fat diet predicted worse corner test performance. While shorter filament tips predicted more ipsiversive turning, longer filament tips appeared to predict contraversive turning. Age, sex, and weight interacted when predicting the infarct volume. Older age was associated with smaller infarcts on day 2 magnetic resonance imaging, especially in animals with larger body weights; this association was most conspicuous in females. High-fat diet also predicted smaller infarcts. In contrast, the use of cerebral blood flow monitoring and more severe cerebral blood flow drop during MCAo, longer anesthesia, and longer filament tips all predicted larger infarcts. Bivariate analyses among the dependent variables highlighted a disconnect between tissue and functional outcomes.
conclusionsOur analyses identified variables affecting endovascular filament MCAo outcome, an experimental stroke model used worldwide. Multiple regression refuted some commonly reported predictors and revealed previously unrecognized associations. Given the multicenter prospective design that represents a sampling of real-world conditions, the degree of heterogeneity mimicking clinical trials, the large number of predictors adjusted for in the multivariable model, and the large sample size, we think this is the most definitive analysis of the predictors of preclinical stroke outcome to date. Future multicenter experimental stroke trials should standardize or at least ensure a balanced representation of the biological and procedural variables identified herein as potential confounders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.