SynthesisCurrent cardiology reviews2024
The Association between Serum Follistatin-like Proteins and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Current cardiology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollistatin-like proteins (FSTLs) are adipomyokines secreted by adipocytes and myocytes. Previous studies have reported an increase in circulating FSTL1 levels in response to cardiovascular injuries. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to assess the association between circulating FSTLs and Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs).
methodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. After screening the articles, we selected eligible studies, extracted relevant data, and calculated the pooled Standardized Mean Difference (SMD). We also conducted a sensitivity analysis to identify sources of heterogeneity and assessed publication bias.
resultsAmong the 577 articles initially retrieved, we included 5 studies comprising a total of 941 cases with CVDs and 446 controls. All included studies measured FSTL1 levels. The pooled SMD analysis revealed a significant difference in circulating FSTL1 levels between subjects with CVDs and control groups (SMD = 0.853, 95% CI = 0.158-1.548, P = 0.016). Heterogeneity was primarily attributed to a single study that measured FSTL1 levels in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. No publication bias was observed.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate significantly higher levels of FSTL1 in patients with CVD compared to control subjects. This suggests that FSTL1 may have potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in CVDs. However, further well-designed studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.