Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39034671›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of primary health care2024

Quality of the digital gp visits and characteristics of the users: retrospective observational study.

Sanna Lakoma, Henna Pasanen, Kaisla Lahdensuo, Jaakko Pehkonen, Jutta Viinikainen, Paulus Torkki

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Medical teleconsultation from the patient's perspective. A demographic segmentation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanna LakomaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Henna PasanenDepartment of Economics, Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics (JSBE), Finland.
Kaisla LahdensuoMehiläinen, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaakko PehkonenDepartment of Economics, Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics (JSBE), Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9684-7139
Jutta ViinikainenDepartment of Economics, Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics (JSBE), Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-3147
Paulus TorkkiDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1127-4205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study compares the demographics, diagnoses, re-admission rates, sick leaves, and prescribed medications of patients accessing digital general practitioner (GP) visits with those of patients opting for traditional face-to-face appointments in a primary health care setting.

designThe study adopted a retrospective analysis of patient record data collected in 2019, comparing visits to a digital primary health center with traditional health center visits.

settingPrimary health care.

participantsThe data encompassed patients who utilized the digital clinic and those who visited public health centers for primary health care services.

main outcome measuresThe study assessed demographics, health diagnoses, prescribed medications, sick leave recommendations, re-admission rates, and differences in costs between digital clinic and face-to-face visits. Secondary outcomes included a comparative analysis of medication categories, resolution rates for health problems, and potential impacts on health care utilization.

resultsDigital clinic users were typically younger, more educated, and predominantly female compared with health centre users. Digital visits were well-suited for uncomplicated infections, while health centre appointments were associated with a higher prevalence of chronic conditions. Medication patterns differed between the two modalities, with digital clinic users receiving generic over-the-counter drugs and antibiotics, whereas health centre visits commonly involved cardiac and antihypertensive medications. Sick leave recommendations were slightly higher in the digital clinic, but the difference was not significant. Approximately 70% of health problems addressed in the digital clinic were successfully resolved, and the cost of digital visits was about 50,3% of face-to-face appointments.

conclusionDigital health care services offer a cost-efficient alternative for specific health problems, appealing to younger, educated individuals, when compared to the users of public health center, and may enable improvement of cost-effectiveness combined with acceptable demand management and patient segmentation practices. The results highlight the potential benefits of digital clinics, particularly for uncomplicated cases, while also emphasizing the importance of suitable referral mechanisms for in-person consultations.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesSick LeaveTelemedicineYoung Adultdigital healthcare servicesgeneral practicePrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID39034671
PMCPMC11552287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.