ReviewMedical education2025
Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review.
Review in Medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identity without milestones: a narrative inquiry into the rites of passage shaping professional identity formation in health professions educators.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Near-Peer Anatomy-Anchored Teaching.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- VISIONARA - developing a concept for decentralized competency-based learning in primary health care and its proposed evaluation.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Development of clinical teaching competency framework and scale for physician teachers in China: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Influence of psychological capital on the research ability of master's degree students in medical academic degrees: the mediating role of research investment and the moderating role of mentorship guidance.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The dual-role clinician teacher: A human bridge for socially responsible AI use.Medical education · 2025Article
- Generative artificial intelligence for general practice; new potential ahead, but are we ready?The European journal of general practice · 2025Article
- The impact of the formal rationalization of healthcare on physician clinical teaching in a United States academic medical center.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review.Medical education · 2025Review
- Boundary Spanning Behavior of Clinician-Teachers in the Classroom. An Observation Study.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Observational
- Increasing the focus on critical appraisal of trials and financial conflict of interest in medical training programs: a perspective from oncology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinician-teachers, physicians with educational responsibilities in either classroom or clinical setting, are assumed to add value by virtue of their dual role. The clinical responsibilities are often prioritised over the educational tasks. How and under which circumstances clinician-teachers are able to perform their educational role and create added value for different stakeholders is currently unclear.
objectivesTo identify for whom, how and under which circumstances educational activities executed by CTs by virtue of their dual role add value to others. SCOPE: CTs activities linking the system of education and clinical practice beyond direct patient interactions and purposefully executed.
methodsA realist review was conducted. Databases were searched in two stages: a narrow conventional search, followed by a comprehensive artificial intelligence-aided search. Studies concerning clinician-teachers' dual role were included. Realist analysis was applied to identify in which contexts resource mechanisms triggered reasoning mechanisms, which led to specific outcomes for different stakeholders.
resultsSixty-six studies were included. In contexts where clinician-teachers' dual role was formally recognised and valued, clinician-teachers benefitted from the credibility and legitimacy bestowed on them, making the transfer of domain-specific knowledge more impactful. In contexts where sociocultural differences between both systems existed, CTs were able to mediate and adjust recommendations aligned with stakeholders' perceived relevance. Also, contexts organised to support both roles made resource mechanisms more impactful. Clinician-teachers added value to students' clinical competency and learning environment, and to educational organisations' curricular innovation. In their clinical workspace, clinician-teachers added value by enhancing colleague physicians' teaching expertise, implementing educational innovations and recruiting students for scarce specialisms.
conclusionClinician-teachers add value to students, colleague physicians and the clinical and educational contexts at large. Domain-specific knowledge of both systems was important to gain credibility and achieve added value. Openness, formal recognition and allocated time for both roles in educational and clinical contexts towards the dual role are important to strengthen the impact of the dual role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.