Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39034416›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Artificial intelligence in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Umile Giuseppe Longo, Sergio De Salvatore, Federica Valente, Mariajose Villa Corta, Bruno Violante, Kristian Samuelsson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Step-by-step insight into gait analysis: A narrative review unlocking knee biomechanics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Umile Giuseppe LongoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, 200 - 00128, Italy. g.longo@unicampus.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4063-9821
Sergio De SalvatoreIRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy.
Federica ValenteDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, 21 - 00128, Italy.
Mariajose Villa CortaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, 21 - 00128, Italy.
Bruno ViolanteOrthopaedic Department, Clinical Institute Sant'Ambrogio, IRCCS - Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Kristian SamuelssonDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, 21 - 00128, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools in total (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) emerges with the potential to improve patient-centered decision-making and outcome prediction in orthopedics, as ML algorithms can generate patient-specific risk models. This review aims to evaluate the potential of the application of AI/ML models in the prediction of TKA outcomes and the identification of populations at risk.An extensive search in the following databases: MEDLINE, Scopus, Cinahl, Google Scholar, and EMBASE was conducted using the PIOS approach to formulate the research question. The PRISMA guideline was used for reporting the evidence of the data extracted. A modified eight-item MINORS checklist was employed for the quality assessment. The databases were screened from the inception to June 2022.Forty-four out of the 542 initially selected articles were eligible for the data analysis; 5 further articles were identified and added to the review from the PUBMED database, for a total of 49 articles included. A total of 2,595,780 patients were identified, with an overall average age of the patients of 70.2 years ± 7.9 years old. The five most common AI/ML models identified in the selected articles were: RF, in 38.77% of studies; GBM, in 36.73% of studies; ANN in 34.7% of articles; LR, in 32.65%; SVM in 26.53% of articles.This systematic review evaluated the possible uses of AI/ML models in TKA, highlighting their potential to lead to more accurate predictions, less time-consuming data processing, and improved decision-making, all while minimizing user input bias to provide risk-based patient-specific care.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningClinical Decision-MakingHumansKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAIArtificial intelligenceJoint replacementKnee replacementMachine LearningOrthopaedics

Identifiers

PMID39034416
PMCPMC11265144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.