ArticleBMC immunology2024
Putative new combination vaccine candidates identified by reverse vaccinology and genomic approaches to control enteric pathogens.
Article in BMC immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- One Health Perspective on the EnterotoxigenicMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- A pangenome-based strategy for designing a multi-epitope vaccine against non-toxin antigens of necrotic enteritis-associated Clostridium perfringens.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe pathogenic microorganisms that cause intestinal diseases can significantly jeopardize people's health. Currently, there are no authorized treatments or vaccinations available to combat the germs responsible for intestinal disease.
methodsUsing immunoinformatics, we developed a potent multi-epitope Combination (combo) vaccine versus Salmonella and enterohemorrhagic E. coli. The B and T cell epitopes were identified by performing a conservancy assessment, population coverage analysis, physicochemical attributes assessment, and secondary and tertiary structure assessment of the chosen antigenic polypeptide. The selection process for vaccine development included using several bioinformatics tools and approaches to finally choose two linear B-cell epitopes, five CTL epitopes, and two HTL epitopes.
resultsThe vaccine had strong immunogenicity, cytokine production, immunological properties, non-toxicity, non-allergenicity, stability, and potential efficacy against infections. Disulfide bonding, codon modification, and computational cloning were also used to enhance the stability and efficacy of expression in the host E. coli. The vaccine's structure has a strong affinity for the TLR4 ligand and is very durable, as shown by molecular docking and molecular modeling. The results of the immunological simulation demonstrated that both B and T cells had a heightened response to the vaccination component.
conclusionsThe comprehensive in silico analysis reveals that the proposed vaccine will likely elicit a robust immune response against pathogenic bacteria that cause intestinal diseases. Therefore, it is a promising option for further experimental testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.