Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39034371›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

High temperature sensitivity of Arctic isoprene emissions explained by sedges.

Hui Wang, Allison M Welch, Sanjeevi Nagalingam, Christopher Leong, Claudia I Czimczik, Jing Tang, Roger Seco, Riikka Rinnan, Lejish Vettikkat, Siegfried Schobesberger and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Heat waves may trigger unexpected surge in aerosol and ozone precursor emissions from sedges in urban landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hui WangDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA. huiw16@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3380-6903
Allison M WelchDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Sanjeevi NagalingamDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-5742
Christopher LeongDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Claudia I CzimczikDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8251-6603
Jing TangCenter of Volatile Interactions (VOLT), Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7961-8214
Roger SecoInstitute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2078-9956
Riikka RinnanCenter of Volatile Interactions (VOLT), Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark. riikkar@bio.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7222-700X
Lejish VettikkatDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6808-5643
Siegfried SchobesbergerDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5777-4897
Thomas HolstDepartment of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Shobhit BrijeshDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Rebecca J SheesleyDepartment of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-0571
Kelley C BarsantiDepartment of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Center for Environmental Research & Technology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Alex B GuentherDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA. alex.guenther@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6283-8288

Funding

Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (Danish National Research Foundation) DNRF168EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 771012National Science Foundation (NSF) ANS-2041251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been widely reported that isoprene emissions from the Arctic ecosystem have a strong temperature response. Here we identify sedges (Carex spp. and Eriophorum spp.) as key contributors to this high sensitivity using plant chamber experiments. We observe that sedges exhibit a markedly stronger temperature response compared to that of other isoprene emitters and predictions by the widely accepted isoprene emission model, the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN). MEGAN is able to reproduce eddy-covariance flux observations at three high-latitude sites by integrating our findings. Furthermore, the omission of the strong temperature responses of Arctic isoprene emitters causes a 20% underestimation of isoprene emissions for the high-latitude regions of the Northern Hemisphere during 2000-2009 in the Community Land Model with the MEGAN scheme. We also find that the existing model had underestimated the long-term trend of isoprene emissions from 1960 to 2009 by 55% for the high-latitude regions.

Identifiers

PMID39034371
PMCPMC11271288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.